MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039714832 · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316613

Augmentation of pulmonary blood flow and cardiac output by non-invasive external ventilation late after Fontan palliation

2020· article· en· W3039714832 on OpenAlexafffund
Pradeepkumar Charla, Gauri Rani Karur, Kenichiro Yamamura, Shi‐Joon Yoo, John Granton, Erwin Oechslin, Ashish H. Shah, Osami Honjo, Luc Mertens, Rafael Alonso-González, Kate Hanneman, Rachel M. Wald

Bibliographic record

VenueHeart · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity Health NetworkToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersHealth CanadaHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsMedicineFontan procedureVentricleCardiologyVentilation (architecture)Internal medicineCardiac outputHemodynamicsAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives Although a life-preserving surgery for children with single ventricle physiology, the Fontan palliation is associated with striking morbidity and mortality with advancing age. Our primary objective was to evaluate the impact of non-invasive, external, thoraco-abdominal ventilation on pulmonary blood flow (PBF) and cardiac output (CO) as measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in adult Fontan subjects. Methods Adults with a dominant left ventricle post-Fontan palliation (lateral tunnel or extracardiac connections) and healthy controls matched by sex and age were studied. We evaluated vascular flows using phase-contrast CMR imaging during unassisted breathing, negative pressure ventilation (NPV) and biphasic ventilation (BPV). Measurements were made within target vessels (aorta, pulmonary arteries, vena cavae and Fontan circuit) at baseline and during each ventilation mode. Results Ten Fontan subjects (50% male, 24.5 years (IQR 20.8–34.0)) and 10 matched controls were studied. Changes in PBF and CO, respectively, were greater following BPV as compared with NPV. In subjects during NPV, PBF increased by 8% (Δ0.20 L/min/m 2 (0.10–0.53), p=0.011) while CO did not change significantly (Δ0.17 L/min/m 2 (−0.11–0.23), p=0.432); during BPV, PBF increased by 25% (Δ0.61 L/min/m 2 (0.20–0.84), p=0.002) and CO increased by 16% (Δ0.47 L/min/m 2 (0.21–0.71), p=0.010). Following BPV, change in PBF and CO were both significantly higher in subjects versus controls (0.61 L/min/m 2 (0.2–0.84) vs −0.27 L/min/m 2 (−0.55–0.13), p=0.001; and 0.47 L/min/m 2 (0.21–0.71) vs 0.07 L/min/m 2 (−0.47–0.33), p=0.034, respectively). Conclusion External ventilation acutely augments PBF and CO in adult Fontan subjects. Confirmation of these findings in larger populations with longer duration of ventilation and extended follow-up will be required to determine sustainability of haemodynamic effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeartSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207