Interrelation between the relative fat mass index and other obesity indices in predicting clinical severity and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ENWEndNote BIBJabRef, Mendeley RISPapers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero AMA Jelavic M, Babic Z, Pintaric H. Interrelation between the relative fat mass index and other obesity indices in predicting clinical severity and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. 2020;16(2):198-201. doi:10.5114/aic.2020.96064. APA Jelavic, M., Babic, Z., & Pintaric, H. (2020). Interrelation between the relative fat mass index and other obesity indices in predicting clinical severity and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, 16(2), 198-201. https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2020.96064 Chicago Jelavic, Marko Mornar, Zdravko Babic, and Hrvoje Pintaric. 2020. "Interrelation between the relative fat mass index and other obesity indices in predicting clinical severity and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction". Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej 16 (2): 198-201. doi:10.5114/aic.2020.96064. Harvard Jelavic, M., Babic, Z., and Pintaric, H. (2020). Interrelation between the relative fat mass index and other obesity indices in predicting clinical severity and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, 16(2), pp.198-201. https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2020.96064 MLA Jelavic, Marko Mornar et al. "Interrelation between the relative fat mass index and other obesity indices in predicting clinical severity and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction." Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, vol. 16, no. 2, 2020, pp. 198-201. doi:10.5114/aic.2020.96064. Vancouver Jelavic M, Babic Z, Pintaric H. Interrelation between the relative fat mass index and other obesity indices in predicting clinical severity and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. 2020;16(2):198-201. doi:10.5114/aic.2020.96064.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".