MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039802226 · doi:10.1109/lcsys.2020.3003514

Robust Control Design of Underactuated 2 × 2 PDE-ODE-PDE Systems

2020· article· en· W3039802226 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Control Systems Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Controllability of Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsBP (Canada)University of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacksteppingOdeUnderactuationControl theory (sociology)Boundary (topology)Controller (irrigation)Partial differential equationTransformation (genetics)MathematicsComputer scienceApplied mathematicsControl (management)Mathematical analysisAdaptive control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we design a robust stabilizing controller for a system composed of two sets of linear heterodirectional hyperbolic PDEs, with actuation at one boundary of one of the PDEs, and couplings at the middle boundary with ODEs in a PDE-ODE-PDE configuration. The system is underactuated since only one of the PDE systems is actuated. The design approach employs a backstepping transformation to move the undesired system couplings to the proximal boundary (where the actuation is located). We can then express this target system as a time-delay neutral system for which we can design an appropriate control law to obtain an exponentially stable target system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it