MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039835148 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3005913

Estimator-Based Control for Pure-Feedback Systems With Incomplete Measurements

2020· article· en· W3039835148 on OpenAlexaff
Lidong Wang, Xiaoping Liu, Xuebo Chen, Tong Li, Yingxin Wei, Xinze Xue

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersScientific Research Fund of Liaoning Provincial Education DepartmentUniversity of Science and Technology LiaoningNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)BacksteppingEstimatorState estimatorBounded functionLyapunov functionComputer scienceNonlinear systemMathematical optimizationControl systemConstraint (computer-aided design)Linear matrix inequalityMathematicsAdaptive controlControl (management)StatisticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates estimator-based control problems for pure-feedback nonlinear systems with incomplete measurements due to the transmission packet losing or sensor saturation. The incomplete measurements can cause the state variables unavailable or distorted, which can degrade the performance of the system. To solve these problems, a state estimator is designed for the data-losing case, based on which two backstepping control methods are developed. The output of the system is subject to a prescribed constraint by using an obstacle Lyapunov function. By solving a linear matrix inequality, the stability conditions of the state estimator and closed-loop system are derived. It is proved that the control scheme can guarantee that all the signals of the closed-loop system are uniformly ultimately bounded in mean square. The effectiveness of the proposed methods is confirmed by simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207