MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039968050 · doi:10.1017/s143192760003806x

Effects of Confinement on Arborescent Graft Polystyrene Particle Shape

2000· article· en· W3039968050 on OpenAlexaff
T.M. Chou, Abdelaziz Aitouchen, Matthew Libera, RM Briber, Mario Gauthier

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy and Microanalysis · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolystyreneParticle (ecology)Materials scienceComposite materialGeologyPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Arborescent graft polymers are highly branched materials synthesized by grafting multiple generations of macromolecular precursors on a central core [1,2]. They can be synthesized with controllable size and molecular weight depending on the number of generations and the precursor molecular weight. They possess many of the unique structural [3], thermodynamic, and rheological [4] properties of dendrimers but do so on a length scale roughly one order of magnitude higher. This research describes the effect of confinement on the shape of arborescent graft polystyrene (PS). This work used 3rd generation arborescent graft PS synthesized with 5kg/mole linear polystyrene precursor (G3- 5K). The G3-5K PS sample was mixed to a dilution of approximately 0.005 wt% in toluene. A single drop of solution was placed on either a holey-carbon film or an ultrathin continuous carbon film. The solvent was evaporated under ambient conditions. A Philips CM20 FEG TEM/STEM equipped with a Gatan 666 PEELS and a 679 multiscan CCD camera was used to study the structure of these specimens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicroscopy and MicroanalysisSame topicDendrimers and Hyperbranched PolymersFrench-language works237,207