Non-humains (« esprits ») et cycles saisonnier et circadien chez les Inuit canadiens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans la pensée inuit, le monde sensible était non seulement peuplé d’humains et d’animaux, mais également d’une multitude d’êtres non humains (autres que les animaux), souvent dénommés « esprits », aux caractéristiques presque aussi variées qu’il est possible d’en imaginer et formant des sociétés originales. Un trait pourtant semble les distinguer de ce que les ethnographes rapportent bien souvent de leurs enquêtes à travers les continents : les non-humains inuit n’apparaissent pas ontologiquement liés au monde de la nuit et de l’obscurité. Une singularité que l’on propose de mettre en correspondance avec cette autre ligne de force de la pensée inuit qui voit dans les relations entre obscurité et lumière, et entre nuit et jour, continuité plutôt qu’opposition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".