MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3040137673 · doi:10.1017/s1431927600033353

New Approaches for Energy Filtered Imaging and EELS Analysis

2000· article· en· W3040137673 on OpenAlexaff
Gianluigi A. Botton

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy and Microanalysis · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectron energy loss spectroscopyResolution (logic)Scanning transmission electron microscopyTransmission electron microscopyMaterials scienceSpectrometerSpectroscopyCharacterization (materials science)Chemical imagingEnergy (signal processing)Imaging spectroscopyEnergy filtered transmission electron microscopySpectral lineImage resolutionMicroscopyElectron microscopeAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OpticsNanotechnologyChemistryHyperspectral imagingPhysicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Electron energy-loss spectroscopy imaging is now becoming an established and indispensable tool in high-resolution materials characterization. Whether the imaging approach is based on post column filters attached to a conventional transmission electron microscope (TEM) or on parallel spectrometers on a scanning (field emission) TEM, energy filtered (EF) microscopy is having a significant impact in materials science (e.g. Ref. 1). Elemental mapping, however, is not the only imaging tool accessible with EF microscopy. EELS images and spectra are often only part of the data that is obtained when samples are characterized in an analytical TEM. Complementary information is also obtained from EDS spectra which are often analyzed independently from the EELS data and from EELS near edge structures. When the EELS fine structure is altered due to changes in chemical state of the probed atoms, additional information is accessible and can potentially be used in novel methods of image acquisition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicroscopy and MicroanalysisSame topicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207