Creating Canada: Emily Pauline Johnson and the Dramatic Monologue
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
I argue that the late-nineteenth-century dramatic monologue shifted to depict the relationship between multiple societies rather than an individual speaker versus his or her society. The poetic form expanded from depictions of idiosyncratic individuals to global negotiations between communities and the rage and violence that resulted. E. Pauline Johnson's dramatic monologues participated in this shift and, in so doing, challenged Anglo-Canadian audiences to confront their understanding of themselves as a British colony. Johnson's use of poetic tropes from Britain, Canada, and the United States suggested a universality of values between colonizer and colonized that the colonized Indigenous peoples of Canada surpassed the British in upholding these values. Johnson's dramatic monologues invited Anglo-Canadians to join in her rage and created a new conception of what it meant to be Canadian by questioning the foundational assumptions of colonial society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it