La transition agro-écologique: une politique de développement durable comme les autres ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peut-on analyser les politiques de développement durable comme n’importe quel domaine des politiques publiques ? Jusqu’à aujourd’hui les questions environnementales ont disposé d’un statut à part dans l’analyse des politiques publiques. Dans un premier temps, l’article dresse les difficultés théoriques et historiques qui ont pu être un obstacle à la normalisation des études environnementales dans le domaine agricole. La deuxième partie de l’article est consacrée à l’analyse empirique d’un domaine de politique publique concerné par l’écologisation: le plan agro-écologique pour la France lancé en 2012. La troisième partie propose une remontée en généralité théorique, en proposant d’observer si les politiques agroécologiques peuvent être expliquées de manière heuristique à l’aide des grilles classiques du gouvernement à distance et du New Public Management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".