MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3040401833 · doi:10.20996/1819-6446-2020-06-12

Efficacy of Trimetazidine and Sulodexide in Patients with Microvascular Angina

2020· article· en· W3040401833 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
С. А. Болдуева, И. А. Леонова, О. В. Захарова

Bibliographic record

VenueRational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrimetazidineMedicineAnginaInternal medicineQuality of life (healthcare)Canadian Cardiovascular SocietyPerfusionCardiologyAnesthesiaMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background . Despite the progress in the diagnostics of microvascular angina ( МА ) there is no effective pathogenetic therapy. Aim . To study the effect of trimetazidine and sulodexide as a part of drug therapy on clinical manifestations, exercise tolerance, quality of life, myocardial perfusion and endothelial function in patients with MA. Material and methods . Patients with MA (n=90) were included into the study and randomized into 3 groups. Patients of the first group (control; n=30) received standard antianginal therapy. The second group (treatment group; n=30) received standard therapy and sulodexide (1 ampoule of 600 IU intramuscularly for 10 days, then 1 capsule of 250 IU, 2 times a day). Patients of the third group (treatment group; n=30) received standard therapy and trimetazidine with modified release 35 mg 2 times a day. Evaluation of angina symptoms and quality of life by the Seattle Questionnaire, stress (treadmill) test, positron emission tomography (baseline, adenosine test, cold-pressor test), peripheral arterial tonometry were performed at baseline and 3 months after starting treatment. Results . After 3 months of treatment a significant improvement in symptoms, quality of life and results of stress-test were observed only among patients of treatment groups, most pronounced in the 3rd group. Patients of this group showed an increase in myocardial blood flow >25% according to positron emission tomography (from 86.2±29.7 to 129.5±41.0 ml/100g/min, p<0.05 for anterior interventricular artery; from 93.3±30.5 to 131.7±32.7 ml/100g/min, p<0.05 for circumflex artery; from 91.3±30.4 to 135.9±41.1 ml/100g/min, p<0.05 for right coronary artery) and a significant increase in coronary reserve, as well as an improvement in endothelial function: an increase in coronary reserve of endothelium-dependent vasodilation, an increase in the reactive hyperemia index according to peripheral arterial tonometry (from 1.44±0.14 to 1.73±0.18, p<0.001). Conclusion . Improvement of the clinical picture, quality of life, myocardial perfusion, and endothelial function was observed among microvascular angina patients who were treated with standard antianginal therapy and trimetazidine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRational Pharmacotherapy in CardiologySame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207