MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3040409386 · doi:10.1017/s1431927600028294

The Stem Vasculature of <i>Na1/Na1</i> and <i>Na2/Na2</i> Mutants in Maize

2001· article· en· W3040409386 on OpenAlexaffabout
Wayne Y Cheng, Ping‐chin Cheng, Miṅ Gu, Xiaosong Gan, D. B. Walden

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy and Microanalysis · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLeaf Properties and Growth Measurement
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMutantMaterials scienceOpticsOptical microscopeMicroscopeConfocalPlant stemBiologyAnatomyBotanyChemistryPhysicsScanning electron microscopeBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The vasculature of two recessive dwarf mutants, nana-1 (nal) (FIG 1) and nana-2 (na2) (FIG 2) of maize (Zea mays)were studied. All the plants used in this study were grown at the field station of University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, in the summer of 2000. The specimens were fixed in methanol, serially sectioned with a razor blade using a specially made jig. The image was obtained by using a modified Acer 620T flat-bed scanner in liquid (Cheng et al., 2001). The optical sections were obtained by twophoton florescence microscopy using an Olympus Fluorview FL300 confocal microscope equipped with a Spectra-Physics Mai-Tai tunable ultra-fast Ti-sapphire laser. Excitation wavelengths was set at 780nm NIR with a pulse width of l00fs, &amp;lt;550nm autofluorescence was detected. Extended focus views were generated by using AutoQuant's AutoVisualize-3D™ software. Different from the parallel arranged longitudinal vascular bundles commonly found in the internodes of wild type, nal/nalhas a complex stem vasculature (FIG 3)(Cheng et al., 2000a; 2000b).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicroscopy and MicroanalysisSame topicLeaf Properties and Growth MeasurementFrench-language works237,207