MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3040431016 · doi:10.12732/ijam.v33i3.6

ON QUARTER-SWEEP FINITE DIFFERENCE SCHEME FOR ONE-DIMENSIONAL POROUS MEDIUM EQUATIONS

2020· article· en· W3040431016 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Apllied Mathematics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicDifferential Equations and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiti Malaysia Sabah
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Porous mediumScheme (mathematics)Finite difference methodFinite difference schemeFinite differenceMathematicsPorosityMathematical analysisApplied mathematicsMaterials scienceHistoryComposite materialArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we introduce an implicit finite difference approximation for one-dimensional porous medium equations using Quarter-Sweep approach. We approximate the solutions of the nonlinear porous medium equations by the application of the Newton method and use the Gauss-Seidel iteration. This yields a numerical method that reduces the computational complexity when the spatial grid spaces are reduced. The numerical result shows that the proposed method has a smaller number of iterations, a shorter computation time and a good accuracy compared to Newton-Gauss-Seidel and Half-Sweep Newton-Gauss-Seidel methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it