Mechanical function of cardiac fibre bundles is partly protected by exercise in response to diet-induced obesity in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Decrements in contractile function resulting from obesity are thought to be major reasons for the link between obesity and cardiovascular disease, while exercise has been shown to improve cardiac muscle contractile function. The purpose of this study was to evaluate cardiac contractile properties following obesity induction and the potential protective effect of exercise. Twelve-week-old rats (n = 30) were organized into either a chow diet or a high-fat, high-sucrose (HFHS) diet group. Following 12 weeks of obesity induction the HFHS group animals were stratified and grouped into sedentary (HFHS+Sed) and exercise (HFHS+Ex) groups for an additional 12 weeks. Following 24 weeks of diet intervention, with 12 weeks of aerobic exercise (25 m/min, 30 min/day, 5 days/week) for the HFHS+Ex group, skinned cardiac fibre bundle testing was used to evaluate cardiac contractile properties. Body fat and mass were significantly greater in the HFHS-fed animals compared with the chow controls (p < 0.043). Hearts from rats in the HFHS+Sed group had significantly greater mass (p < 0.03), significantly slower maximum shortening velocity (p = 0.001), and tended to have lower calcium sensitivity (p = 0.077) and a lower proportion of α-myosin heavy chain composition (p = 0.074) than the sedentary chow animals. However, 12 weeks of moderate aerobic exercise partially prevented these decrements in contractile properties. Novelty Cardiac muscle from animals exposed to an obesogenic diet for 24 weeks had impaired contractile properties compared with controls. Obesity-induced impairment of contractile properties of the heart were partially prevented by a 12-week aerobic exercise regime.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".