Identifying novel high-impact rare disease-causing mutations, genes and pathways in exomes of Ashkenazi Jewish inflammatory bowel disease patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of chronic diseases, affecting different parts of the gastrointestinal tract, that mainly comprises Crohn’s Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC). Most IBD genomic research to date has involved genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of common genetic variants, mostly in Europeans, resulting in the identification of over 200 risk loci. The incidence of IBD in Ashkenazi Jews (AJ) is particularly high compared to other population groups and rare protein-coding variants are significantly enriched in AJ. These variants are expected to have a larger phenotypic effect and are hypothesized to complement the missing heritability that cannot be fully addressed by GWAS in IBD. Therefore, we genetically identified 4,974 AJs IBD cases and controls from whole exome sequencing (WES) data from the NIDDK IBD Genetics Consortium (IBDGC). We selected credible rare variants with high predicted impact, aggregated them into genes, and performed gene burden and pathway enrichment analyses to identify 7 novel plausible IBD-causing genes: NCF1, CES1, ICAM1, INPP5D, ABCB1, IL33 and TLR4 . We further perform bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing, demonstrating the likely relatedness of the novel genes to IBD. Importantly, we demonstrate that the rare and high impact genetic architecture of AJ adult IBD displays a significant overlap with very early onset IBD (VEOIBD) genetics. At the variant level, we performed Phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS) in the UK Biobank to replicate risk sites in IBD and reveal shared risk sites with other diseases. Finally, we showed that a polygenic risk score (PRS) has high power to differentiate AJ IBD cases from controls when using rare and high impact variants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".