Cohabitation et espace de rencontre comme moteurs de la nouvelle ruralité au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le contexte actuel des recompositions socioterritoriales que connaissent les campagnes québécoises, se façonnent de nouveaux processus d’habitabilité intimement liés à la cohabitation d’individus et de groupes qui n’habitent pas cet espace de la même manière. Cet article propose de dépasser la lecture binaire axée sur les antagonismes opposant les nouveaux ruraux et les ruraux de longue date. Il met de l’avant qu’il faut plutôt s’attacher à leur « espace de rencontre » pour conceptualiser la nouvelle ruralité qui marque ce début du XXIe siècle au Québec. L’espace de rencontre n’est pas sans créer des tensions puisqu’il est l’occasion de confronter rêves et ambitions, usages, visions et aspirations. Il représente une occasion de dialogue et de prise de décision démocratique à partir desquels se construit la nouvelle ruralité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".