Cohabitation et espace de rencontre comme moteurs de la nouvelle ruralité au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le contexte actuel des recompositions socioterritoriales que connaissent les campagnes québécoises, se façonnent de nouveaux processus d’habitabilité intimement liés à la cohabitation d’individus et de groupes qui n’habitent pas cet espace de la même manière. Cet article propose de dépasser la lecture binaire axée sur les antagonismes opposant les nouveaux ruraux et les ruraux de longue date. Il met de l’avant qu’il faut plutôt s’attacher à leur « espace de rencontre » pour conceptualiser la nouvelle ruralité qui marque ce début du XXIe siècle au Québec. L’espace de rencontre n’est pas sans créer des tensions puisqu’il est l’occasion de confronter rêves et ambitions, usages, visions et aspirations. Il représente une occasion de dialogue et de prise de décision démocratique à partir desquels se construit la nouvelle ruralité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".