MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3040817038 · doi:10.31306/s.62.2.4

Analiza modela procesa upravljanja zaštitom na radu u Republici Hrvatskoj

2020· article· hr· W3040817038 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSigurnost · 2020
Typearticle
Languagehr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicRegional Development and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsColas (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsPolitical scienceBusinessPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SAŽETAK: Rad prikazuje analizu modela procesa upravljanja zaštitom na radu u Republici Hrvatskoj. Model procesa proizlazi iz nacionalnih zakonskih odredaba kojima se uređuje ovo područje. U prvom dijelu rada težište se daje na teoretske postavke upravljanja procesima, procesnog pristupa i zaštite na radu. Razumijevanje teoretskih postavki neophodno je zbog provedbe sustavne analize modela procesa upravljanja zaštitom na radu. U drugom dijelu rada prikazuje se analiza modela procesa upravljanja zaštitom na radu. Pri tome se analiziraju ključne dužnosti i obveze sudionika procesa upravljanja zaštitom na radu u Republici Hrvatskoj. Na temelju provedene analize u raspravi i zaključku navode se mogućnosti za poboljšanje upravljanja procesom zaštite na radu u Republici Hrvatskoj.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it