MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041018134 · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.00606

Methodologies for Transcript Profiling Using Long-Read Technologies

2020· review· en· W3041018134 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Genetics · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsMcGill Genome CentreMcGill University
FundersCanada Foundation for InnovationCompute CanadaGenome Canada
KeywordsComputational biologyNanopore sequencingTranscriptomeRNA-SeqBiologyDNA sequencingDe novo transcriptome assemblyRNAGenomicsDeep sequencingProfiling (computer programming)GeneGenomeComputer scienceGeneticsGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RNA sequencing using next generation sequencing technologies (NGS) is currently the standard approach for gene expression profiling, particularly for large scale high-throughput studies. NGS technologies comprise of high throughput, cost efficient short-read RNA-Seq while emerging single molecule, long-read RNA-Seq technologies have enabled new approaches to study the transcriptome and its function. The emerging single molecule, long-read technologies are currently commercially available by Pacific Bioscience (PacBio) and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT), while new methodologies based on short-read sequencing approaches are also being developed in order to provide long range single molecule level information, for example the ones represented by the 10X Genomics linked read methodology. The shift towards long-read sequencing technologies for transcriptome characterization is based on current increases in throughput and decreases in cost, making these attractive for de novo transcriptome assembly, isoform expression quantification and in-depth RNA species analysis. These types of analyses were challenging with standard short sequencing approaches due to the complex nature of the transcriptome which consists of variable lengths of transcripts and multiple alternatively spliced isoforms for most genes as well as the high sequence similarity of highly abundant species of RNA, such as rRNAs. Here we aim to focus on single molecule level sequencing technologies and single cell technologies which, combined with perturbation tools, allow the analysis of complete RNA species, whether short or long, at high resolution. In parallel these tools have opened new ways in understanding gene functions at the tissue, network and pathway level, as well as their detailed functional characterisation. Analysis of the epi-transcriptome, including RNA methylation and modification and the effects of such modifications on biological systems is now enabled through direct RNA sequencing instead of classical indirect approaches. However, many difficulties and challenges remain, such as methodologies to generate full length RNA or cDNA libraries from all different species of RNAs, not only poly-A containing transcripts, the identification of allele specific transcripts due to current error rates of single molecule technologies, while the bioinformatics analysis on long read data for accurate identification of 5’ and 3’UTRs is still in development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it