MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041058296 · doi:10.1149/09707.0279ecst

A Stable Lithium-ion Selenium Batteries Enabled by Microporous Carbon/Se and Fluoroethylene Carbonate Additive

2020· article· en· W3041058296 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Hossein Aboonasr Shiraz, Yongfeng Hu, Jian Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaraday efficiencyAnodeElectrolyteMicroporous materialMaterials scienceCathodeLithium (medication)Chemical engineeringBattery (electricity)GraphiteCarbon fibersDimethyl carbonateInorganic chemistryChemistryElectrodeComposite materialOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithium-ion batteries are among the most promising rechargeable batteries, due to their exceptional power and energy characteristics. However, they cannot meet the increasing demand from end-users for higher energy density. Herein, we reported a lithium-ion selenium battery by using lithiated graphite/silicon anode and microporous carbon/Se (MPC/Se) cathode with a fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC)-containing carbonate electrolyte. FEC additive enabled a stable MPC/Se cathode due to the suppressed dissolution of polyselenides into the electrolyte and improved the mechanical stability-integrity of graphite/silicon anode, leading to the formation of stable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer on both the cathode and anode surfaces. As a result, lithium-ion selenium battery delivered a high specific capacity and excellent stability. The results showed a specific capacity of 356 mAh g -1 (normalized to Se) and Coulombic efficiency of 99.9% after 125 cycles for the full cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207