MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041192801 · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2020.07.001

Aortic Thrombus Formation During Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Ventricular Septal Rupture

2020· article· en· W3041192801 on OpenAlexaff
Omid Kiamanesh, Yasbanoo Moayedi, Jennifer Chung, Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan, Jeremy Kobulnik

Bibliographic record

VenueCJC Open · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationCardiologyMedicineInternal medicineThrombusMyocardial infarctionShuntingAfterloadAortic valveCardiogenic shockHemodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 59-year-old male with a late-presentation inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction presented with cardiogenic shock and multiorgan failure due to a large ventricular septal rupture (VSR; 2.6 cm) with left-to-right shunting (Video 1, view video online) despite an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). We performed femoral cannulation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) as a bridge-to-surgery. We suspected the absence of left ventricular (LV) ejection through the aortic valve, based on a lack of arterial pulsatility with the IABP on standby, posing a risk of aortic root thrombosis. We performed transesophageal echocardiography to exclude an aortic thrombus and optimize hemodynamics to ensure there was both LV ejection and systemic perfusion. With VA ECMO flows of 3.75 LPM, the aortic valve remained closed and there was spontaneous echo contrast and early thrombus formation in the aortic root (Video 2, view video online). We reduced VA ECMO flows to 3.25 LPM and maintained IABP support at 1:1 to reduce afterload to the heart, which resulted in LV ejection through the aortic valve and an improvement of spontaneous echo contrast (Video 3, view video online). The spontaneous echo contrast cleared completely with a further reduction in VA ECMO flows to 3.00 LPM (Video 4, view video online). The patient was ultimately deemed ineligible for VSR patch repair and died shortly after the implementation of a palliative approach to care. A cornerstone of management for VSR is afterload reduction using an IABP and vasodilators to promote forward flow as a bridge to surgical repair. VA ECMO has been used in severe cases to reduce surgical risk by reversing multiorgan failure and allowing for infarct evolution.1Ariza-Solé A. Sánchez-Salado J.C. Sbraga F. et al.The role of perioperative cardiorespiratory support in post infarction ventricular septal rupture-related cardiogenic shock.Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020; 9: 128-137Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 2Muller Moran H.R. Dutta V. Yan W. et al.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation before surgical repair of a postinfarction ventricular septal defect.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 155: e121-e123Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar, 3Neragi-Miandoab S. Michler R.E. Goldstein D. D’Alessandro D. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a temporizing approach in a patient with shock, myocardial infarct, and a large ventricle septal defect; successful repair after six days.J Card Surg. 2013; 28: 193-195Crossref PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar However, the use of femoral VA ECMO increases LV afterload4Burkhoff D. Sayer G. Doshi D. Uriel N. Hemodynamics of mechanical circulatory support.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66: 2663-2674Crossref PubMed Scopus (222) Google Scholar and will worsen left-to-right shunting through a VSR. These unique and unfavourable hemodynamics create a challenge to provide systemic perfusion with VA ECMO while allowing for LV ejection through the aortic valve in the presence of a VSR. LV ejection can be monitored using the pulse pressure as a surrogate or by echocardiographic visualization of aortic valve opening. Some methods of LV unloading promote LV ejection, but we lack randomized data comparing devices and strategies.5Russo J.J. Aleksova N. Pitcher I. et al.Left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with cardiogenic shock.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73: 654-662Crossref PubMed Scopus (117) Google Scholar We illustrate the real-time development of aortic root thrombus, a devastating complication of VA ECMO, in response to an increased afterload produced by ECMO support in the presence of a VSR.Novel Teaching Points•VA ECMO can provide cardiac support as a bridge to surgical repair of ventricular septal rupture, but it will increase left-to-right shunting.•Aortic thrombus is a complication of VA ECMO that results when there is insufficient forward flow through the aortic valve.•Aortic thrombus may occur with VA ECMO for VSR despite LV unloading, and it is more likely to occur with higher VA ECMO flows. •VA ECMO can provide cardiac support as a bridge to surgical repair of ventricular septal rupture, but it will increase left-to-right shunting.•Aortic thrombus is a complication of VA ECMO that results when there is insufficient forward flow through the aortic valve.•Aortic thrombus may occur with VA ECMO for VSR despite LV unloading, and it is more likely to occur with higher VA ECMO flows. Dr Kiamanesh receives funding from the Arthur J.E. Child Cardiology Fellowship. The other authors have no funding sources to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCJC OpenSame topicCardiac Structural Anomalies and RepairFrench-language works237,207