MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041205205 · doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100827

Breast lesion characterization using Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) and derivative texture methods

2020· article· en· W3041205205 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchTerry Fox Foundation
KeywordsTexture (cosmology)LesionDerivative (finance)UltrasoundCharacterization (materials science)MedicineRadiologyComputer sciencePathologyArtificial intelligenceMaterials scienceNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Accurate and timely diagnosis of breast cancer is extremely important because of its high incidence and high morbidity. Early diagnosis of breast cancer through screening can improve overall prognosis. Currently, biopsy remains as the gold standard for tumor pathological confirmation. Development of diagnostic imaging techniques for rapid and accurate characterization of breast lesions is required. We aim to evaluate the usefulness of texture-derivate features of QUS spectral parametric images for non-invasive characterization of breast lesions. METHODS: QUS Spectroscopy was used to determine parametric images of mid-band fit (MBF), spectral slope (SS), spectral intercept (SI), average scatterer diameter (ASD), and average acoustic concentration (AAC) in 204 patients with suspicious breast lesions. Subsequently, texture analysis techniques were used to generate texture maps from parametric images to quantify heterogeneities of QUS parametric images. Further, a second-pass texture analysis was applied to obtain texture-derivate features. QUS parameters, texture-parameters and texture-derivate parameters were determined from both tumor core and a 5-mm tumor margin and were used in comparison to histopathological analysis in order to develop a diagnostic model for classifying breast lesions as either benign or malignant. Both leave-one-out and hold-out cross-validations were used to evaluate the performance of the diagnostic model. Three standard classification algorithms including a linear discriminant analysis (LDA), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and support vector machines-radial basis function (SVM-RBF) were evaluated. RESULTS: Core and margin information using the SVM-RBF attained the best classification performance of 90% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 91% accuracy, and 0.93 AUC utilizing QUS parameters and their texture derivatives, evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation. Implementation of hold-out cross-validation using combination of both core and margin information and SVM-RBF achieved average accuracy and AUC of 88% and 0.92, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: QUS-based framework and derivative texture methods enable accurate classification of breast lesions. Evaluation of the proposed technique on a large cohort using hold-out cross-validation demonstrates its robustness and its generalization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it