Breast lesion characterization using Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) and derivative texture methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Accurate and timely diagnosis of breast cancer is extremely important because of its high incidence and high morbidity. Early diagnosis of breast cancer through screening can improve overall prognosis. Currently, biopsy remains as the gold standard for tumor pathological confirmation. Development of diagnostic imaging techniques for rapid and accurate characterization of breast lesions is required. We aim to evaluate the usefulness of texture-derivate features of QUS spectral parametric images for non-invasive characterization of breast lesions. METHODS: QUS Spectroscopy was used to determine parametric images of mid-band fit (MBF), spectral slope (SS), spectral intercept (SI), average scatterer diameter (ASD), and average acoustic concentration (AAC) in 204 patients with suspicious breast lesions. Subsequently, texture analysis techniques were used to generate texture maps from parametric images to quantify heterogeneities of QUS parametric images. Further, a second-pass texture analysis was applied to obtain texture-derivate features. QUS parameters, texture-parameters and texture-derivate parameters were determined from both tumor core and a 5-mm tumor margin and were used in comparison to histopathological analysis in order to develop a diagnostic model for classifying breast lesions as either benign or malignant. Both leave-one-out and hold-out cross-validations were used to evaluate the performance of the diagnostic model. Three standard classification algorithms including a linear discriminant analysis (LDA), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and support vector machines-radial basis function (SVM-RBF) were evaluated. RESULTS: Core and margin information using the SVM-RBF attained the best classification performance of 90% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 91% accuracy, and 0.93 AUC utilizing QUS parameters and their texture derivatives, evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation. Implementation of hold-out cross-validation using combination of both core and margin information and SVM-RBF achieved average accuracy and AUC of 88% and 0.92, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: QUS-based framework and derivative texture methods enable accurate classification of breast lesions. Evaluation of the proposed technique on a large cohort using hold-out cross-validation demonstrates its robustness and its generalization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".