MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041219671 · doi:10.1353/bio.2019.0085

Modernist Lives: Biography and Autobiography at Leonard and Virginia Woolf's Hogarth Press by Claire Battershill

2019· article· en· W3041219671 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiography · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicModernist Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiographyModernism (music)Art historyPoliticsLife writingPublishingReading (process)HistoryArtLiteratureSociologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Modernist Lives: Biography and Autobiography at Leonard and Virginia Woolf's Hogarth Press by Claire Battershill Miriam Fuchs (bio) Modernist Lives: Biography and Autobiography at Leonard and Virginia Woolf's Hogarth Press Claire Battershill Bloomsbury Academic, 2018, 248 pp. ISBN 978-1350043817, $114.00 hardback, $39.95 paperback. Claire Battershill's Modernist Lives: Biography and Autobiography at Leonard and Virginia Woolf's Hogarth Press is the latest volume in the Bloomsbury Academic series Historicizing Modernism. This series publishes books that use newly discovered documents and little-known archival materials to expand upon ways that scholars have looked at writing from the late nineteenth century through the Second World War. Volumes in the series emphasize what the editors call "historical specificities" to generate "fresh views of intellectual contexts and working methods." Modernist Lives does precisely that. Battershill's most important resources are the Hogarth Press Business Archives (University of Reading, England); Monk's House Papers and The Leonard Woolf Papers (University of Sussex); the digitalized Modernist Archives Publishing Project; and additional holdings in the US and Canada. Acknowledging previous [End Page 879] archival and critical work in line with her own efforts, as well as future research that remains to be done, Battershill establishes the scope of her book to be biography and autobiography in Hogarth's list of over 500 titles. Although the Woolfs' interests as publishers reached beyond literature to sociology, psychology, art, politics, translation, and economics, Battershill effectively shows Leonard and Virginia Woolf intently and consistently engaged in all varieties of life writing as integral to the larger modernist enterprise. Working with data and correspondence from the original files, the author cites details on manuscript acquisitions, genre categorization, print runs, editions, pricing, marketing venues, book design, reviewing, and more. While she acknowledges that hers is but one approach in the reconsideration of modernism, her conclusions are both useful and broad, exploring the dynamics between materialist and literary cultures and between the business of publishing and the intellectual endeavor of producing art and text. Most readers interested in literary modernism will know the basic facts. As a project that Leonard and Virginia Woolf started out of their home after World War I, Hogarth Press published modernist writers such as Eliot, Stein, Joyce, Katherine Mansfield, Vita Sackville-West, the Bloomsbury group, and Virginia Woolf's manuscripts, including Kew Gardens, Mrs. Dalloway, To the Lighthouse, Jacob's Room, and The Waves. Hogarth's reputation for making experimentalist texts available to a small, select readership—initially in hand-printed editions with designs by Vanessa Bell—has eclipsed the 500+ books and pamphlets the press put out over thirty years. Battershill demonstrates that the mission was to achieve "diversity" and that the Woolfs sought "writers of various social classes, nationalities, ages, political and ideological persuasions, genres, and sexualities" (6). Her focus, though, is on the diverse biographical and autobiographical selections in the press's offerings. Battershill's thesis is that the Woolfs' evolving views on lifewriting genres as expansive and experimental led them to print what they deemed interesting, appealing, and politically and formally progressive. The appendix shows, for example, that the booklist for 1937 included Can I Help You?, an etiquette book with autobiographical elements by the actress Viola Tree, and numerous children's biographies like Socrates, Darwin, and Joan of Arc. Other 1937 selections were quite different: The Amberly Papers, a collection of family letters and diaries edited by Bertrand and Patricia Russell, Virginia Woolf's The Years, and Freud's An Autobiographical Study. The volume covers the period in which the Woolfs maintained sole control over the business through 1938, when John Lehmann, already working at the press, purchased Virginia Woolf's share, and finally to 1946, when Leonard Woolf arranged for Hogarth to become an imprint of Chatto & Windus. The introduction, which clarifies Battershill's position relative to other scholars, singles out Helen Southwell for her edited collection, Leonard and Virginia Woolf: The Hogarth Press and the Networks of Modernism, and her research on Hogarth and working-class writers. Other scholars are cited for their work on the press and anticolonialism, contemporary politics, feminism, and religion (7). Battershill interweaves [End Page 880] information from the archives...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it