MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041235473 · doi:10.1353/tj.2020.0058

Encounters on Contested Lands: Indigenous Performances of Sovereignty and Nationhood in Québec by Julie Burelle

2020· article· en· W3041235473 on OpenAlex
Rebecca Harries

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTheatre Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSovereigntyIndigenousColonialismConstitutionIdentity (music)AppropriationPolitical scienceEthnologyPoliticsHistorySociologyPolitical economyLawGender studiesAestheticsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Encounters on Contested Lands: Indigenous Performances of Sovereignty and Nationhood in Québec by Julie Burelle Rebecca Harries ENCOUNTERS ON CONTESTED LANDS: INDIGENOUS PERFORMANCES OF SOVEREIGNTY AND NATIONHOOD IN QUÉBEC. By Julie Burelle. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2018; pp. 224. Encounters on Contested Lands is an impressive, important book that contributes to a wider reckoning with the representation of the Indigenous people of Canada as part of that nation's settler colonial history. Julie Burelle's work addresses the complex issue of identity and representation through an analysis of contemporary film, performance, and activism. She takes the 1990 Oka crisis as a starting point to address competing claims of sovereignty by the European French-language settlers and the Indigenous peoples of Québec. Burelle then looks back to the notorious Durham report of 1839, which portrayed the descendants of Nouvelle France as having "no culture," through the Duplessis era of the 1950s and the Quiet Revolution of the 1960s. Québec's struggle for sovereignty reaches a climax, as described by Burelle, in the 1980 referendum and the conflicts around the creation of a Canadian constitution in the 1980s. This history of the French settlers and their struggle for self-determination might seem to allow for connection to and even alliance with the history of violence and oppression against Canada's Indigenous peoples, but as Burelle convincingly sets forth, this history has instead resulted in complex and particular forms of appropriation and competition. The Oka crisis was the consequence of a land dispute involving the municipal government of Oka, which approved real-estate development on the unceded ancestral territory of the Mohawks of Kanehsatà:ke. Shaney Komulainen's iconic photo of the standoff is the first of Burelle's encounters. Her cogent analysis explores the representation of a vulnerable settler colonial identity (the soldier's youth, bare face, shorter stature) threatened by a seemingly powerful Other (masked, taller, impossible to identify). Following Wendy Brown's theory of identity as "wounded attachment," Burelle interprets the settler Québecois soldier as inviting identification with a wronged and vulnerable group struggling for rights. In her introduction, she also admirably defines important terms for her discussion—the difference between First Nations and Indigenous, for example, and terms like Québecois de souche (souche translates as "root," allowing the settler population to claim a form of indigeneity)—before introducing the structure of her work. The first two chapters analyze theatre and film works by prominent Québecois de souche artists. The next two look at the artistic work of Indigenous artists and political activists in Québec that unsettle colonial narratives. The fifth and final chapter broadens the conversation beyond the Indigenous peoples of Québec by juxtaposing an adaptation of an ancient Mayan performance text and a legal dispute between the Kumeyaay nation and the University of California, San Diego. Chapter 1 is a detailed analysis of Québec actor and writer Alexis Martin's ambitious and imaginative staged history of Québec, Invention du chauffage central en Nouvelle-France (2012). While Burelle's analysis acknowledges the strengths of this work as an entertaining history of serious intent (it was widely acclaimed by critics), she identifies how Indigenous peoples are staged within it as "figures of transit," there to represent a past whose value lies in its disconnection from contemporary Québecois de souche subjects, who are in danger of being assimilated into Americanized consumer society (37). Martin adapts an Indigenous metaphor, "a land where the cold is so great … that words lie frozen," to describe the way that his contemporaries have forgotten their roots (the phrase plays on the word souche) (31). In the idealized past staged by Martin, Indigenous peoples and the settlers of Nouvelle France existed in harmony, especially compared to the English settlers. Burelle points out that while these early benign encounters have a historical basis, the golden age did not last long. Martin restages a myth of consent, and Burelle aptly compares it to the Play of Neptune, staged in Port Royal in 1606, which portrayed Mi'kmaq chieftains welcoming the settlers and blessing their appropriation of land. Burelle shifts her analysis to film in...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it