MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041363918 · doi:10.1109/dapps49028.2020.00007

BlockAM: An Adaptive Middleware for Intelligent Data Storage Selection for Internet of Things

2020· article· en· W3041363918 on OpenAlexaff
Syed Muhammad Danish, Kaiwen Zhang, Hans‐Arno Jacobsen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMiddleware (distributed applications)Internet of ThingsSelection (genetic algorithm)The InternetWorld Wide WebComputer networkDistributed computingArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current Internet of Things (IoT) infrastructures, with its massive data requirements, rely on cloud storage: however, usage of a single cloud storage can place limitations on the IoT applications in terms of service requirements (performance, availability, security etc.). Multi-cloud storage architecture has been emerged as a promising infrastructure to solve this problem, but this approach has limited impact due to the lack of differentiation between competing cloud solutions. Multiple decentralized storage solutions (e.g., based on blockchains) are entering the market with distinct characteristics in terms of architecture, performance, security and availability and at a lower price compared to cloud storage. In this work, we introduce BlockAM: an adaptive middleware for the intelligent selection of storage technology for IoT applications, which jointly considers the cloud, multi-cloud and decentralized storage technologies to store large-scale IoT data. We model the cost-minimization storage selection problem and propose two heuristic algorithms: Dynamic Programming (DP) based algorithm and Greedy Style (GS) algorithm, for optimizing the choice of data storage based on IoT application's service requirements. We also employ blockchain to store IoT data on-chain in order to provide data integrity, auditability and accountability to the middleware architecture. Comparisons among the heuristic algorithms are conducted through extensive experiments, which demonstrates that DP heuristic and GS heuristic achieve up to 92% and 80% accuracy respectively. Moreover, the price associated with a specific IoT application data storage decrease by up to 31.2% by employing our middleware solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityFrench-language works237,207