MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041432071 · doi:10.55765/atps.i13.259

La intencionalidad politica de la animación y el papel del animador sociocultural

2018· article· es· W3041432071 on OpenAlex
Carolina Márquez Herrera

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale animation territoires et pratiques socioculturelles · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Art Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La necesidad por comprender los impactos sociales de las metodologías comunitarias conllevan a pensar en los procesos reflexivos que se dan a partir de la relación entre el sujeto y el objeto colectivizado en el proceso metodológico en sí, por ello se abordan algunos elementos que se dan entre esta relación, de ahí que, el papel que se da a partir de la intencionalidad política de la animación y el papel que tiene el animador permiten o no generar escenarios que posibilitan los alcances sociales y la capacidad para configurar sujetos politizados, que a su vez se vuelven multiplicadores de cambios. Igualmente, aproximarse a los posibles límites que presenta El presente análisis se realiza desde los procesos comunitarios retomados como experiencias a partir de la Animación de las ciudades de Bogotá y Medellín.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it