MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041440210 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.200736

Disasters, pandemics and mental health

2020· article· en· W3041440210 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Clare Pain, Ruth A. Lanius

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai HospitalWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicPopulationMental healthCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Nuclear power plantSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Phase (matter)Fukushima Nuclear AccidentMedical emergencySuicide preventionPoison controlEnvironmental healthMedicinePsychiatryChemistryPathologyDiseasePhysicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After a disaster, population rates of psychological distress tend to double or triple. Acute-phase reactions and disorders generally resolve within a year; however, there is considerable variation in recovery times.[1][1] Subsequent to the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, for

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207