MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Permian post-collisional basic magmatism from Corsica

2020· article· en· W3041450161 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Boscaini, Andrea Marzoli, Joshua H.F.L. Davies, Massimo Chiaradia, Hervé Bertrand

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMaficPermianMagmatismGeochemistryZirconOrogenyBasaltSubductionMantle (geology)PetrologyTectonicsPaleontologyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Post-Variscan early Permian magmatism is widespread in Corsica with mafic dykes emplaced during the extensional tectonic phase which followed the Variscan orogeny. This study focuses on a mafic dyke swarm intruded in the region of Ajaccio (Corsica, France). New U-Pb zircon geochronological data show that these intrusions were emplaced at ca. 282 Ma. Most Ajaccio dykes have a calc-alkaline affinity, while a few dykes show tholeiitic affinity resembling N-MORB basalts. Calc-alkaline to tholeiitic dykes are characterized by enriched to depleted Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic compositions, respectively. We interpret these data as evidence that an enriched mantle source, which was likely formed during Variscan subduction, sourced the calc-alkaline suite, while a depleted mantle component dominates the source of the tholeiitic suite. Notably, coeval Permian mafic intrusive bodies from throughout Corsica and from the Southern, Central and Western Alps display similar ages and geochemical features to the Ajaccio dyke swarm. This indicates that a widespread Permian magmatic province developed in a post-orogenic extensional tectonic setting at the margin of the former Variscan belt

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→