MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041457149 · doi:10.1142/s0219199720500583

Remarks on solitary waves and Cauchy problem for Half-wave-Schrödinger equations

2020· article· en· W3041457149 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Contemporary Mathematics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Canadian institutionsPacific Institute for the Mathematical SciencesUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsInitial value problemCauchy problemZero (linguistics)Mathematical analysisCauchy distributionStability (learning theory)Wave equationd'Alembert's formulaPlane waveMathematical physicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsDifferential equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study solitary wave solutions of the Cauchy problem for Half-wave-Schrödinger equation in the plane. First, we show the existence and the orbital stability of the ground states. Second, we prove that given any speed [Formula: see text], traveling wave solutions exist and converge to the zero wave as the velocity tends to [Formula: see text]. Finally, we solve the Cauchy problem for initial data in [Formula: see text], with [Formula: see text]. The critical case [Formula: see text] still stands as an interesting open problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.328
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.062 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it