MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041468218 · doi:10.18192/potentia.v4i0.4395

Bringing Human Rights into the Debate on the Global Trafficking of Women

2012· article· en· W3041468218 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Navid Pourmokhtari

Bibliographic record

VenuePotentia Journal of International Affairs · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemiseGeopoliticsGlobalizationPoliticsHuman rightsPolitical scienceSoviet unionOrder (exchange)World orderCold warPolitical economyWorld War IIDevelopment economicsSociologyLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Often perceived as a major turning point in history, the fall of the Berlin Wall significantly altered the socio-political, economic, and security dimensions of the global ‘landscape’. In eliminating the ‘bipolar’ world order that had persisted in the aftermath of WWII, the demise of the Soviet Union and subsequent removal of the associated geopolitical barriers set the stage for the geographical expansion of globalisation within a new world order.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.057
Scholarly communication0.0130.017
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0130.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePotentia Journal of International AffairsSame topicSex work and related issuesFrench-language works237,207