MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Open-Access Experimental Dataset for Breast Microwave Imaging

2020· article· en· W3041607742 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrowave imagingLogistic regressionComputer scienceBreast cancerImaging phantomArtificial intelligenceMachine learningBreast imagingMedical imagingClassifier (UML)MammographyMedical physicsData miningMicrowaveMedicineCancerRadiologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microwave imaging has shown potential for breast cancer screening, but further evaluation of the clinical viability of breast microwave imaging (BMI) systems is required. Previous phantom studies have shown promise, but after decades of BMI research, simulation studies still dominate. This work addresses the challenges of small sample sizes and a lack of experimental data by providing an open-source experimental dataset, obtained using a pre-clinical BMI system. The University of Manitoba BMI Dataset (UM-BMID) contains data from 1257 phantom scans. UM-BMID is publicly available, and the community is encouraged to use it for large-scale BMI analysis. The application of logistic regression for tumor-detection on a subset of the dataset was studied to demonstrate one use of UM-BMID. The diagnostic accuracy of the classifier was (85 ± 4)%, demonstrating the promise of machine learning methods for tumor-detection in BMI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering AnalysisFrench-language works237,207