<i>Nox,</i> Unboxed: Anne Carson’s Uncommon Long Verse “Epitaph” (or Economies of the Unlost)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anne Carson’s Nox (2010) is a multi-form double elegy in memory of the poet’s brother, Michael, and of an elegiac precursor to Catullus’s “Elegy no. 101.” While Nox’s uniquely monumental form has invited analyses particularly by scholars of media studies and book history, this article focuses instead on Nox’s conceptualization at the intersection of elegy and epitaph. I argue that Nox’s peculiar contribution to contemporary elegy arises from its merging of the long poem elegy with the epitaph, resulting in a poetics of loss that is at once expansive and economical. As such, Nox embodies the paradox of an epitaph in long verse form, a form marked by a unique style of ironic economic rationalism. Further, I argue that Nox requires reading strategies that take into account both its materiality as a textual artefact and its simultaneous excess of that materiality, insofar as it can be read as a further unfolding from earlier phases of Carson’s work with elegy and epitaph, especially Economy of the Unlost (1999).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".