MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3041669110 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2390

A successful search for intervening 21 cm H i absorption in galaxies at 0.4 < z <1.0 with the Australian square kilometre array pathfinder (ASKAP)

2020· article· en· W3041669110 on OpenAlexaff
E. M. Sadler, Vanessa A. Moss, J. R. Allison, E. K. Mahony, M. T. Whiting, H. M. Johnston, Sara L. Ellison, Claudia del P. Lagos, B. Koribalski

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsPhysicsRedshiftAstrophysicsGalaxyRadio telescopePathfinderHydrogen lineLine (geometry)Line-of-sightAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We have used the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) radio telescope to search for intervening 21 cm neutral hydrogen (H i) absorption along the line of sight to 53 bright radio continuum sources. Our observations are sensitive to H i column densities typical of Damped Lyman Alpha absorbers (DLAs) in cool gas with an H i spin temperature below about 300–500 K. The six-dish Boolardy Engineering Test Array (BETA) and twelve-antenna Early Science array (ASKAP-12) covered a frequency range corresponding to redshift 0.4 < z < 1.0 and 0.37 < z < 0.77, respectively, for the H i line. Fifty of the 53 radio sources observed have reliable optical redshifts, giving a total redshift path Δz = 21.37. This was a spectroscopically untargeted survey, with no prior assumptions about the location of the lines in redshift space. Four intervening H i lines were detected, two of them new. In each case, the estimated H i column density lies above the DLA limit for H i spin temperatures above 50–80 K, and we estimate a DLA number density at redshift z ∼ 0.6 of $n(z)=0.19^{+0.15 }_{ -0.09}$. This value lies somewhat above the general trend of n(z) with redshift seen in optical DLA studies. Although the current sample is small, it represents an important proof of concept for the much larger 21 cm First Large Absorption Survey in H i (FLASH) project to be carried out with the full 36-antenna ASKAP telescope, probing a total redshift path $\Delta z\sim \, 50,000$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→