Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lors d’un cours portant sur la Lettre VII de Platon, Michel Foucault introduit l’expression de « réel de la philosophie ». Pour les différents commentateurs de cette leçon, cette formule se rapporte aux actions politiquement efficaces que le philosophe doit effectuer pour insérer la philosophie dans la réalité. Selon nous et contrairement à cette interprétation, la philosophie possède déjà pour Foucault les modalités de sa propre effectivité avant même d’être efficace politiquement. La surestimation de la dimension politique conduit d’autre part à sous-estimer les pratiques de connaissance propre à la philosophie, d’autant que selon nous Foucault se saisit de la notion de « réel philosophique » de Martial Gueroult pour sa propre élaboration du « réel de la philosophie ». Déterminer les modalités du réel de la philosophie selon Foucault, c’est ce à quoi nous nous attachons dans cet article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".