MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041760245 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3522086

The Einstein Toolkit

2019· article· en· W3041760245 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Babiuc-Hamilton, Steven R. Brandt, Peter Diener, Matthew Elley, Z. B. Etienne, Roland Haas, Helvi Witek, Miguel Alcubierre, Daniela Alic, Gabrielle Allen, Marcus Ansorg, Luca Baiotti, Werner Benger, Eloisa Bentivegna, Tanja Bode, Bernd Bruegmann, Giovanni Corvino, Harry Dimmelmeier, Rion Dooley, Nils Dorband, Yaakoub El Khamra, Joshua A. Faber, J. Frieben, Bruno Giacomazzo, Tom Goodale, Carsten Gundlach, Ian Hawke, Scott H. Hawley, Ian Hinder, S. Husa, Sai Iyer, Thorsten Kellermann, Andrew Knapp, Michael Koppitz, Gerd Lanferman, Frank Löffler, Joan Massó, Lars Menger, André Merzky, Mark Miller, Philipp Moesta, Pedro J. Montero, Bruno C. Mundim, Andrea Nerozzi, Christian D. Ott, Ravi Paruchuri, Denis Pollney, David Radice, Thomas Radke, Christian Reisswig, Luciano Rezzolla, David Rideout, Matei Ripeanu, Erik Schnetter, B. F. Schutz, Ed Seidel, Eric L. Seidel, John Shalf, Ulrich Sperhake, Nikolaos Stergioulas, Wai-Mo Suen, Béla Szilágyi, Ryōji Takahashi, Michael Thomas, Jonathan Thornburg, Malcolm Tobias, Aaryn Tonita, P. N. Walker, Mew-Bing Wan, Barry Wardell, Miguel Zilhão, Burkhard Zink, Yosef Zlochower

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRelativity and Gravitational Theory
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEinsteinComputer sciencePhysicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Einstein Toolkit is a community-driven software platform of core computational tools to advance and support research in relativistic astrophysics and gravitational physics. The Einstein Toolkit has been supported by NSF 1550551/1550461/1550436/1550514, Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0060.008
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0880.086

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicRelativity and Gravitational TheoryFrench-language works237,207