MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Peripherally Excited Phased Arrays with Practical Active Huygens’ Sources and Slot Elements

2020· article· en· W3041790615 on OpenAlex
Ayman H. Dorrah, George V. Eleftheriades

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhased arrayComputer scienceExcited statePhysicsElectronic engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsAntenna (radio)Atomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antenna phased arrays have become increasingly important in recent years with the advent of technologies such as 5G communications, automotive radars, and satellite internet. These phased arrays are costly to design, fabricate and deploy. A main component of the cost of traditional phased arrays is that of the necessary feeding network and phase shifters or transceivers. A recently developed concept called the peripherally-excited (PEX) phased array has been proposed which is capable of generating electronically scanned pencil beams with a reduced number of phase shifters. The concept of the PEX phased array relies on peripheral active Huygens’ sources that are used solely along the periphery of the cavity. This paper proposes a practical Huygens’ source implementation which is compatible with printed-circuit-board technology, and exhibits acceptable reflections and mutual coupling between adjacent sources. Furthermore, a specially-engineered slot arrangement is proposed which can achieve effective radiation at broadside and tilted angles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.861
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207