Effect of a Nurse-Led Protocol on Time to Treatment of Partial Occlusions in Central Venous Access Devices in Pediatric Oncology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Central venous access devices (CVADs) are the standard of care in pediatric oncology. Occlusion is a common complication that can lead to delays in therapy, readmission, and CVAD removal and reinsertion. Early treatment of partial occlusions using a standardized protocol may restore patency and increase life span of CVADs. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a nurse-led protocol to manage partial CVAD occlusions in pediatric oncology and autologous bone marrow transplant patients. The protocol enabled nurses to manage partially occluded CVADs by administering thrombolytic therapy following an algorithm and patient-specific standing order. The primary outcome was time from recognition of the partial occlusion to instillation of a thrombolytic. Secondary outcomes were thrombolytic dwell time, number of complete occlusions, and CVAD life span. We used a quasi-experimental, after-only, nonequivalent control group design to compare patients not exposed (retrospective cohort, n = 137) and patients exposed (prospective cohort, n = 101) to the nurse-led protocol. Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare time to treatment, dwell time, and CVAD life span between cohorts, and χ 2 was used to compare the proportion of occlusions classified as complete. Time to treatment was significantly lower in the prospective cohort ( M = 99.9 minutes) versus the retrospective cohort ( M = 483.7 minutes), U = 1366.50, p < .01, as was thrombolytic dwell time, U = 282.50, p < .01. Proportion of complete occlusions and CVAD life span did not differ between cohorts. The nurse-led protocol was effective to manage partial CVAD occlusions in pediatric oncology patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".