MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041914878 · doi:10.29040/jiei.v6i2.1043

Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia Perspektif Ekonomi Islam: Peran Inflasi, Pengeluaran Pemerintah, Hutang Luar Negeri dan Pembiayaan Syariah

2020· article· en· W3041914878 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eny Widiaty, Anton Priyo Nugroho

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL ILMIAH EKONOMI ISLAM · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsInflation (cosmology)Consumption (sociology)DebtQuarter (Canadian coin)Monetary economicsVariablesGovernment (linguistics)Macroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Economic growth is a fundamental indicator in assessing economic performance. In assessing the economic growth, it can use several important variables such as Inflation, Government Consumption Expenditure, Foreign Debts, and Sharia Finance. In turn, this research aims to analyze the impacts of these variables on the economic growth in Indonesia (Quarter I – Quarter IV) in the period of 2011-2018. The Error Correction Model used in the analysis method. The results of the analysis showed that the variable inflation in the long-term harmed economic growth; while, in the short-term, the level of inflation had a positive impact on economic growth. Meanwhile, the variable of Government Consumption Expenditure had a negative contribution to economic growth. Furthermore, foreign debt in the long term hurt economic growth, but for the short term, it could bring the positive one. Variable of Sharia finance showed a good result both in the short term and in the long term with a negative correlation with economic growth in Indonesia. However, all variables of inflation, Government Consumption Expenditure, foreign debts, and sharia finance simultaneously had an impact on National Economic Growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL ILMIAH EKONOMI ISLAMSame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207