MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041919703 · doi:10.1109/lca.2020.3008288

MCsim: An Extensible DRAM Memory Controller Simulator

2020· article· en· W3041919703 on OpenAlexafffund
Reza Mirosanlou, Danlu Guo, Mohamed Hassan, Rodolfo Pellizzoni

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Computer Architecture Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsComputer scienceExtensibilityDramEmbedded systemComputer architecture simulatorMemory controllerCAS latencyScheduling (production processes)Interface (matter)Computer architectureOperating systemComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerous proposals for memory controller (MC) designs have been exposed to the research community. Interest has since been growing in the area of computer architecture and real-time systems to improve the throughput of the system and/or guarantee timing requirements through novel scheduling algorithms. Consequently, comprehensive simulators are highly demanded since they provide an infrastructure for development of new ideas effectively without re-implementing the other parts of the hardware. Although there has been several proposals for off-chip memory device simulators, there is a shortage in their MC counterparts. In this letter, we propose MCsim, an extensible and cycle-accurate MC simulator. Designed as an integrable environment, MCsim is able to run as a trace-based simulator as well as provide an interface to connect with external CPU and memory device simulators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Computer Architecture LettersSame topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207