Unique near isometric ontogeny in the pterosaur <i>Rhamphorhynchus</i> suggests hatchlings could fly
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rhamphorhynchus muensteri is one of the best-known flying reptiles, represented by >130 well-preserved fossil specimens, from hatchlings to full adults. The life history of this pterosaur remains controversial as to when in ontogeny they took flight. Here, we assess the growth of these animals based on the lengths of numerous key elements. We show that changes in the skeletal anatomy of this reptile across its post-hatch size range reveal that R.muensteri exhibited overall near isometric growth in the wings, with slightly negative allometry in the humerus, radius and stronger negative allometry in the fourth metacarpal compared to body length, and slightly positive allometry in the second and third phalanges compared to body length. This pattern is near unique among flying vertebrates and suggests R.muensteri flew soon after hatching. In bats and birds, offspring do not typically fly until nearly adult sized. Conversely, near isometric growth in Rhamphorhynchus suggests it was a precocial flier and that individuals may have inhabited several sequential foraging niches over their lifespan, as some terrestrial and aquatic vertebrates do today.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".