MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

肿瘤坏死因子α基因启动子-857位C→T基因突变与强直性脊柱炎相关性研究

2007· article· en· W30420132 on OpenAlexfundno aff
李志华, 扈凤平

Bibliographic record

Venue济宁医学院学报 · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesHealth CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

目的探讨中国湖南籍汉族强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者人群中,TNF-α-857位C→T基因突变与AS的相关性,及其致病的可能分子生物学机制。方法在164例AS患者和121名正常对照中,用等位基因特异性扩增的方法,对TNF-α基因启动子-857C/T单核苷酸多态性(single nucleotide polymor-phisms,SNPs)进行基因分型,分析单个位点的等位基因和基因型频率是否与AS相关。结果AS患者组TNF-α-857T的等位基因频率(P=0.002)和基因型频率(P=0.000002)均显著超过正常对照组,经Bon-ferroni校正后仍为阳性。结论本研究显示TNF-α-857基因多态性与AS存在显著的相关性,TNF-α-857T可能增加AS的易感性。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue济宁医学院学报→Same topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies→French-language works237,207→