MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3042037308 · doi:10.82308/12130

Monitoring of post-outburst near-infrared flux from the anomalous x-ray pulsar 1E 2259+586

2004· article· en· W3042037308 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Cindy R. Tam

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEarthquake Detection and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPulsarFlux (metallurgy)InfraredAstrophysicsPhysicsAstronomyX-ray pulsarX-rayMaterials scienceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On 18 June 2002, the anomalous X-ray pulsar 1E 2259+586 underwent a major X-ray outburst that lasted several hours and consequently linked AXPs to the class of magnetar-candidates known as soft gamma repeaters (SGRs). Three days after the outburst, observations with the Gemini Observatory showed a near-infrared flux enhancement, presumably associated with the X-ray activity. We have since performed a ~1.5 year monitoring program of the Ks band (2.5 mum) photometry, and find that the flux decreased continually, reaching its pre-burst level after about one year. Comparing both the near-IR flux increase and subsequent decay to those of the X-ray afterglow, we find them to be remarkably consistent. This correlated post-burst activity confirms the association between the X-ray outburst and IR enhancement, and implies a physical link between their origins. In the context of the magnetar model, both types of emission appear to be from the neutron star magnetosphere, although the mechanism powering IR radiation is still unclear. We also compare our results to recent optical/IR observations of other AXPs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.647
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicEarthquake Detection and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207