MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3042143426 · doi:10.37897/rjmp.2018.1.10

Dilemes and difficulties in CHAOS (high congenital obstruction sindrome of respiratory paths) – clinical case

2018· article· en· W3042143426 on OpenAlexaff
Adina Zamfir‐Chiru‐Anton, Alexandru Ulici, Mădălina Georgescu

Bibliographic record

VenueRomanian Journal of Medical Practice · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMedicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

REZUMATSindromul de obstrucţie congenitală a căilor respiratorii superioare (CHAOS) este un sindrom rar, caracterizat prin leziuni malformative (diafragme, stenoze sau atrezii) ale laringelui şi traheei asociate sau nu cu afecţiuni ale altor viscere.Decelarea sindromului se efectuează prin examen ecografic şi RMN încă din primul trimestru de viaţă intrauterină.Incidenţa nu poate fi precizată, mulţi dintre fetuşi decedând in utero sau la naştere.Autorii pun în discuţie opţiunea abordării intervenţiei fetoscopice versus expectaţiunea cu traheotomia la naştere în cazul unui făt cu CHAOS necomplicat cu alte malformaţii.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRomanian Journal of Medical PracticeSame topicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia StudiesFrench-language works237,207