La couverture de la crise soudanaise dans la presse montréalaise, 1885-1904
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce mémoire porte sur la couverture de la crise soudanaise par la presse montréalaise de la fin du XIXe siècle. Cette étude comparative des narrations de la rivalité anglo-française en Afrique que construisent La Presse et le Montreal Daily Star met en valeur, dans le contexte québécois, deux cultures politiques coexistantes : l’impérialisme et le nationalisme. Le point de départ de ce mémoire se situe en 1885 avec la première mention, dans La Presse, des interventions britanniques au Soudan qui mèneront à la crise de Fachoda en 1898 et il se termine à la signature de l’Entente cordiale de 1904, qui marque la résolution des principaux conflits impériaux entre le Royaume-Uni et la France. Cette recherche conclut, d’une part, que le Montreal Daily Star montre une culture politique anglophone adossée à l’impérialisme canadien et britannique, une perspective dont la prégnance s’accentue tout au long de la période étudiée. Au contraire, La Presse se distancie progressivement de ce courant et révèle plutôt l’affirmation d’un nationalisme canadien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".