MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3042172092 · doi:10.1186/s12966-020-00993-w

Correction to: Comparing and assessing physical activity guidelines for children and adolescents: a systematic literature review and analysis

2020· erratum· en· W3042172092 on OpenAlexaff
Anne‐Maree Parrish, Mark S. Tremblay, Stephanie J. Carson, Sanne L. C. Veldman, Dylan P. Cliff, Stewart A. Vella, Kar Hau Chong, María Nácher, Borja del Pozo Cruz, Yvonne Ellis, Salomé Aubert, Billie Spaven, Mohd Jamil Sameeha, Zhiguang Zhang, Anthony D. Okely

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · 2020
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhysical Activity and Health
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBehavioural sciencesAlternative medicinePsychologyClinical nutritionPhysical activityMedicineMedical educationFamily medicinePhysical therapyPsychotherapistPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.047
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.366
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0470.366
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0120.014
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0050.006
Research integrity0.0090.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0860.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical ActivitySame topicPhysical Activity and HealthFrench-language works237,207