MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Examining the Effects of Endothelial BMPR2 Loss on Angiogenesis in Murine Metastatic Lung Tumours

2020· article· en· W3042192224 on OpenAlexaff
Devon V. Cole, Yan Gao, Matthew T. Rätsep, Patricia D.A. Lima, Peter A. Greer, Mark L. Ormiston

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAngiogenesisCancer researchLungBMPR2MedicineInternal medicineBiologyBone morphogenetic proteinGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is proposed that bone morphogenetic protein 9 (BMP9) may play a role in cancer development and tumour angiogenesis; however, its role has not been fully elucidated. Under normal conditions, BMP9 acts as a vascular quiescence factor (David et al., 2008); signalling through Type I and II receptors, including Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptor II (BMPR-II) in the endothelium. However, these effects are highly context dependent. Previous reports examining the role of BMP9 in cancer have shown that BMP9 promotes tumour vascularization and can enhance the growth of ovarian tumours (Cunha et al. 2010, Herrera et al., 2009). The objective of this work is to determine if these contradictory effects are mediated by a loss of BMPR2 in the tumour vasculature endothelium. Adult C57/Bl6 mice, bearing a pulmonary endothelial-specific deletion of the gene encoding BMPR-II (Bmpr2EC-/-) and wildtype littermate controls (Bmpr2EC+/+), were administered syngeneic EO771 breast cancer cells into the mammary fat pad. These cells express red fluorescent protein (RFP) and were assayed for in vitro BMP9 responsiveness through qPCR, western blotting and proliferation assays. After four weeks, the primary tumour was resected to encourage lung metastasis. Four weeks after resection, study endpoint was reached, lungs were collected, and lung tumour burden was quantified as a measure of whole lung fluorescence. 2-photon confocal microscopy was used to quantify tumour burden and vascular network density in the explanted lungs. In vitro, stimulation of EO771 cells with BMP9 (10ng/mL) resulted in an increase in SMAD1/5/9 phosphorylation. However, this signalling response did not translate to a functional proliferative response to BMP9 treatment, relative to unstimulated controls. In vivo, no significant differences were observed in the growth of primary mammary tumours between Bmpr2EC+/+ and Bmpr2EC-/- mice (p=0.9). Lung metastasis burden was also not significantly different in mice lacking pulmonary endothelial ii Bmpr2, when compared to wildtype controls (p=0.2). Our findings suggest that pulmonary endothelial Bmpr2 loss enhances the growth of lung tumour metastases, and that growth is independent of any direct effects of BMP9 on EO771 proliferation. Ongoing studies are examining the effects of recombinant BMP9 administration on metastasis growth in this model, with and without endothelial Bmpr2 deletion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerFrench-language works237,207