Mapping out a 'folded' city : British resident-travellers' writing on Beijing, 1911-1939
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis attempts to develop our understanding of British travel writing on early twentieth century China by focusing specifically on travel narratives about Republican Beijing, building on the argument that earlier British perceptions of China were conditioned by specific geographical locations such as treaty ports and crown colonies, as well as of the major cities. I pay particular attention to the accounts of British resident-travellers who interacted with Beijing more intensively and sought to evoke its urban space with more subtlety and complexity. The major works of travel literature that the chapters in this thesis cover include Sir Harold Acton’s Peonies and Ponies (1941), Sir Reginald Fleming Johnston’ Twilight in the Forbidden City (1934), and Ann Bridge’s Peking Picnic (1932). These texts make a survey of the city from a variety of significant sites, ranging from hutongs and royal palaces to the Legation Quarter and the city’s outskirts. Instead of seeking an all-embracing concept like that of orientalists or colonists to explain British resident-travellers’ encounters with Beijing, I detect an intricate pattern in their perceptions of a foreign city and land at a time of social and political turmoil. To address the point, I expose the selected travel narratives to a repertoire of cultural-geographical theories, including work by Michel Foucault, Lewis Mumford, Nina Chordas, Homi Bhabha, and Lucy Huskinson, etc. By capturing the differences among these three primary authors and their literary characters in terms of modes of residency, intention, occupation, gender, and sexuality, the thesis brings to light divergent discourses about the cultural spatiality of Beijing. I propose that these discourses can be measured in terms of, for example, Foucauldian heterotopia (Chapter One), reconstructive utopia, escapist utopia (Chapter Two), and the unhomely homes and sites of the urban uncanny (Chapter Three). In so doing, the thesis lends Beijing a metaphorical topography rich in dimensionality, rendering its cultural space as if it were upfolded from a flat atlas. Working with the concept of ‘heterotopography’, the thesis affords a new way of understanding how Britons perceived the city of Beijing and its environs. Ultimately, I hope that this approach will supply a stimulus not only to textual scholars but also urban and cultural geographers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".