Mise en œuvre de la lecture interactive auprès d’une élève ayant des incapacités intellectuelles profondes : interaction personne/milieu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article s’inscrit dans une perspective d’interaction entre la personne et le milieu. Ici, la personne a des incapacités intellectuelles profondes et elle est scolarisée dans une classe spéciale où son enseignante met en oeuvre de la lecture interactive. Nous proposons d’analyser cette mise en oeuvre sous l’angle de deux modèles : didactique d’Irwin (2007) et psychopédagogique de Fougeyrollas et ses collaborateurs (1998). Il sera question de l’interaction entre l’élève, un contexte, la classe spéciale, la lecture interactive et le développement des processus liés à la lecture (Irwin, 2007). Il s’agit d’une recherche collaborative. Les résultats issus de cette recherche montre que la personne ayant des incapacités intellectuelles profondes peut développer ses processus impliqués dans l’acte de lire et qu’il est possible d’enseigner avec la littérature de jeunesse à cette clientèle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".