MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3042250769 · doi:10.4095/297366

Geology, Barrow River, Melville Peninsula, Nunavut, NTS 46-O and 46-P

2020· report· en· W3042250769 on OpenAlexaffabout
D Corrigan, L Nadeau, P Brouillette, N Wodicka, R G Berman, M G Houlé

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeninsulaGeologyArchaeologyOceanographyPhysical geographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Barrow River bedrock geology map is the product of targeted mapping carried out during the summer of 2010, enhanced by radiometric age-dating as well as high-resolution aeromagnetic and radiometric surveys completed over previously published geological maps of the Paleoproterozoic Penrhyn Group and its Archean basement in southeastern Melville Peninsula, Nunavut. The high-resolution aeromagnetic survey was utilized to project lithological boundaries beneath Quaternary cover. The map shows complex basement-cover relationships characterized by multiple generations of thrusting and folding in a thick-skinned tectonic regime, followed by dextral transpression along the southern edge of the Penrhyn Group. A late-Archean tectonometamorphic event is recorded by ca. 2.55 Ga monazite in basement gneiss. Onset of rifting prior to deposition of the Penrhyn Group may be indicated by the emplacement of a bimodal suite of granite and leucogabbro-anorthosite at ca. 2.02 Ga. Penrhyn Group units are tentatively correlated with the Piling Group on Baffin Island.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207