CORRECTING SHERRINGTON’S GAIT DYSFUNCTION WITH AN OFF THE SHELF KNEE ORTHOTIC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This professional opinion describes the use of an off the shelf knee orthotic to correct the gait and functional mobility of a patient with hemisensory loss including proprioception following a stroke and provides supporting video. Interestingly, this case corrects a human analogue of a functional deficit found experimentally in monkeys in the 19th century by Mott and Sherrington. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/34528/26530 Video 1 Link: https://online-publication.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/VIDEO-1-CPOJ.mov Video 2 Link: https://online-publication.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/VIDEO-2-CPOJ.mov How To Cite: Balkaya I, Altschuler E.L. Correcting sherrington’s gait dysfunction with an off the shelf knee orthotic. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2020;Volume3, Issue1, No.4. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v3i1.34528 Corresponding Author: Eric L Altschuler, MD, PhDMetropolitan Hospital,1901 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA.E-Mail: altschue@nychhc.orgPhone: (212) 423-6448Fax: (212) 423-6326ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3575-6954
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".