« ON VOUS TOLÈRE, MAIS ON NE VOUS ACCEPTE PAS » : LUTTES POUR LA RECONNAISSANCE DES JEUNES TRANS DANS UN CONTEXTE CISNORMATIF
Bibliographic record
Abstract
De plus en plus, on note un intérêt grandissant pour les jeunes trans mais la plupart des articles publiés visent à décrire leurs expériences en mettant souvent l’accent sur des aspects psychologiques, individuels et relationnels. Encore rares sont les articles qui se penchent sur le contexte social et sur la capacité et la motivation des jeunes à affecter le changement social. Cet article explore la vie sociale des jeunes trans et la manière dont celle-ci a des implications profondes et concrètes dans la vie quotidienne de ces jeunes. L’article présente également les processus de résistance de ces jeunes et comment les dénis de reconnaissance contribuent à produire des changements sociaux dans un contexte transphobe et cisnormatif. La discussion met en lumière l’apport de l’éthique de la reconnaissance pour mieux comprendre les dynamiques de mobilisation et de résistance, ainsi que certaines pistes d’intervention pour le travail social.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".