Justicia espacial, políticas de lo justo e instauraciones transversales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Con carácter exploratorio y propositivo, el artículo pretende realizar un aporte a los estudios reconocidos dentro de la justicia espacial, abriendo un espacio de reflexión teórico-empírica acerca de las formas y las estrategias que construyen lo justo. Para esto, el trabajo se desarrolla de dos partes: primero, se presentan algunas hipótesis y reflexiones en torno al concepto de justicia y las posibilidades del mismo al colocarlo en relación con la idea de lo común aportada por Pierre Dardot y Christian Laval. Segundo, se operativiza la reflexión teórica, analizando las estrategias llevadas adelante por la Coalición Ríos Vivos, enfocando en aquellos elementos que posibilitan observar las modalidades que va tomando el principio de lo común en una praxis concreta de lucha por lo que se considera justo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".